Carlos & Eltjo played a Chain of Command game. Here’s the battle report.
A short impression
Yesterday Maarten, Paul, Huub, new players Carlos& Ruben and me played a game of Mortem & Gloriam. We replayed Chareoneia, 338 BC, an antique battle between Filippus and his son the young Alexander the Great vs Allied Greek city states.
Paul introduced the game to us and was an excellent host, with Huub as his steward. I think that we’re the first gamers in Holland who have played this game. Haven’t seen battle reports from fellow Dutch wargamers so far. So this was a first.
The game was introduced in 2016. Recently writer Simon Hall struck a deal with the Plastic Soldier Company and a polished 2nd edition was published this year. As a ruleset it’s slowly gaining ground. The combination with PSC Ultracast 15mm cheap plastic miniatures from excellent Xyston and Corvus Belli white metal molds might make Ancients cheap and fashionable again.
I like ancients and play mostly De Bellis Antiquitatis so I’m interested in the more advanced variants. I have ambitious plans to compare M&G, DBA, FoG and AdlG some time. So I will probably write a full review. Not now. A first tryout is not enough for a serious review. I will share my first impressions.
The battle we played: Chareoneia
In our club archives we found a 2300 year old documentary, made by the great Macedonian kínematoon Quentintarantinotos, about this great battle. He enscribed stone tablets with pictures of the battle, 24 per minute, and by moving them quickly near a candle we were able to watch an incredible théatron. Check the live pictures!
Meeples & Miniatures reviewed the game. Writer Simon Hall was previously a co-author of the Field of Glory rules, which were published by Osprey Publishing. I regard Field of Glory as a descendant of Phil Barkers DBA. Hall writes in his preface that he is standing ‘on the shoulders of giants’, that he played every version of DBA and DBMM and he thanks Phil Barker. Of course – what would he Ancients hobby be without him?
Hall wants to bring to hobby to new generations – modernize it. In my opinion, M&G is a nicer, more modern version of DBx.
For those who don’t know DBA: DBA is an ancients wargame with 12 units per side. All units have a standard simple movement rate, measured in basewidths, and combat modifier. Units are (often) strong vs unit A (horse vs skirmish troops) but weak vs unit B, C or D (horse vs pike): very rock, paper, scissors. Combat is simple, a D6 + modifier + side or back supporting unit. A player moves 1-6 ‘groups’ each turn, depending on a dice roll. Games can be played in one hour on a small table and the game is very well suited for a competion or a tournament. Athough out of fashion I consider it a superior game, a kind of wargame chess, simple rules, fast, but subtle and complex.
Because players wanted larger, longer and more complex battles Barker designed DBM and DBMM as more ‘advanced’ variants. These games lost followers and fail to attract new gamers. In the past 15 years, Bodley-Scott, Hall and others developed FoG and French designer Caille wrote Art de la Guerre.
I regard all these new rules as Next Generation DBA. Old giant Barker and his wife Sue, both in their eighties, will not reach teenagers or twentysomethings with their rules. The twentyfirst century wargamer wants a hardcover bling-bling book and a phone app. Barker’s English is formal, not casual like many modern rule designers.
The basic Dbx system, a combat results table, a limited number of groups that can be moved per turn and a modifier for side/back support is still the core of the M&G-system. However Hall made some important changes:
- he designed a pre-battle-game (that we didn’t use in our introductory game)
- instead of a combat results table with higher/ lower modifiers, M&G has a system with coloured dice. Black dice are the worst and have many blank sides. Red dice are the best and have many instant kills. In combat, the unit with an advantage will use higher graded dice than the opponent.
- instead of a fixed number of groups that a player can move, decided by a dice roll, a player draws command cards and can discard them, like poker. If he has bad cards he can only order a few or simple movements or less groups.
How we played the game
The game was phalanx like phalanx games should be. With a large phalanx. The Macedonians allowed themselves to be overlapped so their flanks were vulnerable. The Allied Greeks (my Allied Greeks) fought courageously. However, when we stopped (after 5 hours) the game was still a draw, but it was close and if we had played another 30 minutes one of the phalanxes had collapsed.
What I thought of this game
- I liked it. Still I love the simplicity of DBA. Big Battle DBA (36 units, 3 players per side) will often meet my needs.
- Rulebook looks good. Glamrock, the ancient way.
- The coloured dice and cards might be ‘better’ than DBA. No need to check tables.
- Instead, however, we often needed to check movement tables. Can my drilled pikes with these green cards wheel twice or just once?
- Instead of a DBA combat modifier and quick calculations based on a combat results table we calculated the ‘better’ or the ‘worse’-graded dice. Not less simple or less complex than Barkers DBx-system, only different and more tangible.
- The result was ‘historical’ and ‘believable’. I regard battles between a phalanx of riot police and hooligans as modern variants of these old Greek phalanx battles. Storm the line until one of the groups is exhausted.
- The scenario was probably too slow and the rules too complex for Ancient-starters Carlos and Ruben. If you introduce new players, give them the quick and the dead, not the slow and the persistent.
Holland is slowly entering the lockdown-exit-phase. The Dutch government announced that under strict conditions small meetings inside buildings are allowed. Our club board conferred with the administration of the Pontania community club center where we have our meetings. This is our arrangement, for the next three months:
- we can use the building during weekends, Saturday AND Sunday, IF we inform Pontania in advance. As club we will make a schedule, and contact players to open/close the building (YES! YOU TOO CAN BE A KEY MEMBER THIS SUMMER! :-))
- we have a max of 4 tables and 12 players. Players keep distance.
- only full club members are allowed in the building
- you have to reserve in advance. Use the website. No booking? No entrance. Sorry for that, now.
- we might introduce slots: 2hrs max and leave, so that others can use a table.
- No food or drinks will be served, at least not in June and maybe until September. Pontania is not a bar or restaurant (with different sector rules). Strictly speaking, the building is the ‘sports canteen’ of the local leisure and walking club, and all sports canteens are officially closed until 1 September. We don’t want a 4000 euro fine for not strictly adhering. Hopefully the city council will relax the rules if Pontania can clarify to them that the building is in fact a community center with community activities.
We hope that we/Pontania can restart in full in September. The 1,5-meter rule might restrict operations for the moment, but the government is continuously reassessing the situation. No guarantees, but with more confidence, some day we’ll go back to normal. Old normal.
Just two pictures today to show what a happy chaps we are! To quote Shakespeare:
From this day to the ending of the world,
But we in it shall be remember’d;
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother
The picture on top is from the Sharp Practice afternoon we had yesterday, the friendly bold & beautiful is Paul, a Brit working for the EU, we think the Mohicans would be proud of him: the two chaps below are Sjap and Marten, who won the best player award at Alliance Open. And the biggest Amsterdam smile award!
Next clubday is next weekend (Sunday 6), extra day, and Oct 12 (our regular Saturday). See you! Don’t forget to book!
(voor de niet-Bommelaars: Bulle Bas, politiecommissaris, verzucht met grote regelmaat: “Bommel! Het is ook altijd dezelfde!”
Even snel een overzicht van wat spellen die de afgelopen tijd op bij de club passeerden. Maar al die foto’s zijn hetzelfde, zag ik, Bulle Bassend.
Dit is Blücher, met Peter S. Ik verloor.
Er is een vrijwel identieke foto, met Eltjo, van een andere sessie in mei, met het spel Lasalle. Hier niet afgebeeld, want identiek. Lasalle is een uitstekend Sam Mustafa-spel, prima speelbaar. Ook dat spel verloor ik, overigens. Het is ook altijd dezelfde.
Een prachtig spel Sword & Spear. Met Rob en Fred. Erg mooie figuren, van Mark of Fred geloof ik. Nieuwe mode. Dus toch wat anders.
What A Tanker! Samen met Bolt Action en Flames of War gespeeld op de WW2 themapinksterdag in Amsterdam. Ik was niet aanwezig (leve Paramaribo) maar kan uit goede bron melden dat onder meer Karel met een mega-Flames of War er was, en Eltjo. Verschillende mooie tafels.
Warmaster in 10mm. Oude klassieker, figuren van Fred.
Dit is een Napoleon 1806-game, een bordspel met fiches. Zag er vrij inzichtelijk uit. Eltjo vs Maarten, Maarten was er tevreden over. Wellicht bruikbaar als geraamtespel voor een tabletop-campagne – ooit.
Mijn eigen bordspel vorige week was geen succes, helaas. Campaigns of Marlborough, uit 1987. Maarten ergerde zich en ik ook. Vrij simpele regels, maar kartonnen fiches, verschuivende kaart, omvallende stapeltjes, te bondig geformuleerde spelregels, onooglijk spelregelboek (of eigenlijk tijdschrift met offsetdichtbedrukte pagina’s. HEEEEEEEL ERRUG OLD SCHOOL!
Het setje werd op internet aangeraden als simpel 17e-eeuws/ WSS-campagnespel dat makkelijk viel om te zetten naar tabletop-veldslagen. Maar los van de irritatiefactor (waar met wat doorzetten wel overheen valt te komen) is er geen helder systeem om te bepalen uit welke subeenheden een leger bestaat. Het blijft een algemene verplaatsing van ‘een leger met kracht 45’ zonder uitsplitsing of daar nu wel of niet de Koninklijke Garde of de Utrechtse rekruten van de schutterij bij zitten.
Mis ik nog iets? O ja, Saga II. Was zo met omvallende stapeltjes bezig dat ik pas bedacht om een foto te maken van de tafel van Mark en Espen toen de tafel al leeg was. Het is ook altijd hetzelfde 🙂